Strengthen your UPSC exam preparation with daily IAS and UPSC current affairs

Recent Developments:

●The Ministry of Home Affairs has added heatwaves and lightning to India’s nationally notified list of disasters, taking the total number of notified disasters to 14.

●The decision follows the recommendation of the Sixteenth Finance Commission (FC-XVI) and the new operational framework for disaster-risk funds for 2026–27 to 2030–31. The FC-XVI specifically recommended national recognition of both hazards because of their increasing severity, frequency and mortality.

●The change removes the earlier financial disadvantage faced by heatwaves, under which States could generally treat heatwaves as local disasters and use only a limited portion of their State Disaster Response Fund.

●Heatwaves can now be addressed through both immediate relief mechanisms under the SDRF and long-term risk-reduction measures under the SDMF.

●The reform is significant because extreme heat is no longer only a meteorological or public-health concern; it is increasingly a disaster-governance, fiscal and development challenge.

Why Recognition of Heatwaves as a Notified Disaster Matters:

Earlier Funding Constraint:

●Before national notification, States could classify heatwaves as local disasters and utilise SDRF resources subject to a ceiling of up to 10% of their annual SDRF allocation.

●This arrangement created an asymmetry because disasters such as floods and cyclones had access to the regular notified-disaster framework, while heatwaves faced additional financial restrictions.

●The new framework places heatwaves on a more equal financial footing with other nationally notified disasters.

Shift from Relief to Risk Reduction:

●The reform enables States to address both the immediate consequences and the underlying vulnerability associated with extreme heat.

●SDRF resources can support eligible relief and compensation, while SDMF resources can support longer-term measures such as cooling infrastructure, early-warning systems and heat-resilient public facilities.

●This represents a shift from a predominantly response-oriented approach towards a more comprehensive disaster-risk-reduction framework.

India’s Disaster Finance Architecture:

Constitutional and Institutional Basis:

●Under Article 280 of the Constitution, the Finance Commission recommends principles governing financial transfers and disaster-management funding arrangements.

●The Disaster Management Act, 2005 provides the broader statutory framework for disaster management in India.

●Disaster financing operates through State-level and national-level mechanisms designed to ensure that States can respond to disasters while receiving additional assistance when their own resources are inadequate.

Sixteenth Finance Commission Recommendations:

●The FC-XVI recommended approximately ₹2.04 lakh crore for State-level disaster funds for 2026–27 to 2030–31, representing a substantial increase over the previous Finance Commission’s allocation.

●The State-level allocation comprises two principal components:

oState Disaster Response Fund (SDRF): Approximately ₹1.64 lakh crore, intended primarily for disaster response and relief.

oState Disaster Mitigation Fund (SDMF): Approximately ₹0.41 lakh crore, intended for measures that reduce disaster risk and vulnerability.

●The FC-XVI also recommended ₹79,406 crore for national disaster funds during the same award period.

●Allocation among States incorporates a Disaster Risk Index, which considers factors such as hazard, exposure and vulnerability, alongside historical expenditure considerations.

Role of National Disaster Funds:

●National-level disaster funds supplement State resources when the magnitude of a disaster exceeds the State’s financial capacity.

●This architecture reflects the principle that disaster response is primarily State-led but financially supported through cooperative fiscal federalism.

●The framework therefore combines State-level responsibility with national-level fiscal support.

Growing Heat Risk in India:

Increasing Exposure:

●Extreme heat is becoming a major climate-risk multiplier because it affects health, labour productivity, agriculture, water demand, electricity consumption and urban infrastructure.

●A district-level assessment by the Council on Energy, Environment and Water found that 57% of India’s 734 districts, covering approximately 76% of the population, face high to very high heat risk.

●The assessment considers multiple dimensions of risk rather than temperature alone, including hazard, exposure and vulnerability.

●Rising night-time temperatures are particularly concerning because warmer nights reduce the body’s ability to recover from daytime heat exposure.

●Increasing humidity can further intensify heat stress by reducing the effectiveness of evaporative cooling through sweating.

Climate and Development Linkages:

●Heatwaves disproportionately affect outdoor workers, agricultural labourers, construction workers, elderly persons, children and economically vulnerable households.

●Extreme heat can reduce labour productivity, increase cooling demand and place additional pressure on electricity and water systems.

●Therefore, heat resilience must be integrated into urban planning, public health, labour policy, housing, water management and energy planning.

Heat Action Plans and Implementation Gap:

Role of Heat Action Plans:

●The National Disaster Management Authority has promoted Heat Action Plans (HAPs) to help States, districts and cities identify heat risks and implement short-, medium- and long-term interventions.

●A comprehensive HAP should include risk mapping, early warning, public communication, healthcare preparedness, cooling arrangements, water availability and targeted protection of vulnerable groups.

●India has expanded the number of HAPs considerably, but their quality and implementation capacity remain uneven.

Major Implementation Challenges:

●Many local governments lack adequate technical expertise, dedicated financing, reliable risk data and institutional coordination.

●Earlier assessments found that many HAPs relied on departments to identify or reallocate their own resources instead of having dedicated financial mechanisms.

●The new access to SDMF resources creates an opportunity to convert HAPs from planning documents into financially supported resilience programmes.

●States should therefore develop appraisable, location-specific projects instead of relying only on broad policy commitments.

What Can Disaster Funds Finance for Heat Resilience?:

Immediate Response under SDRF:

●SDRF resources can support eligible relief measures and compensation associated with notified heatwave impacts.

●Effective response requires reliable identification and reporting of heat-related deaths, illnesses and livelihood losses.

●Health departments should therefore integrate heat surveillance with disaster-management systems.

Long-Term Mitigation under SDMF:

●SDMF resources can support cooling shelters, heat-resilient public infrastructure, early-warning systems, urban greening, reflective surfaces and climate-sensitive planning.

●Investments should prioritise vulnerable settlements, high-risk occupational groups and areas with limited access to cooling and healthcare.

●Projects should be preceded by risk and vulnerability assessments so that scarce mitigation funds are directed towards locations with the greatest potential risk reduction.

Strengthening Health Surveillance and Loss-and-Damage Data:

Need for Better Heat-Health Data:

●Accurate data on heat-related mortality and morbidity is essential because disaster financing increasingly depends on verified loss and damage.

●Existing surveillance systems primarily identify recognised heatstroke cases but may underestimate the wider burden of heat-aggravated cardiovascular, respiratory and renal conditions.

●India therefore needs a stronger heat-attributable mortality and morbidity surveillance system integrating meteorological, health and demographic information.

Data for Evidence-Based Governance:

●District-level heat-risk mapping should combine temperature, humidity, population vulnerability, occupational exposure, health infrastructure and urban characteristics.

●Such integrated datasets can improve targeting of HAPs, SDMF investments and emergency interventions.

Technology and Innovative Financing:

Multi-Hazard Early Warning Systems:

●India should strengthen real-time warning systems by integrating meteorological observations, satellite data, health surveillance and local communication networks.

●The Cell Broadcast Alert System can disseminate warnings for hazards such as lightning, flash floods, thunderstorms and other events requiring rapid public alerts.

●Similar systems can support heat warnings by providing location-specific and time-sensitive alerts to vulnerable populations.

Parametric Insurance:

●States can explore parametric insurance, under which predetermined payouts are automatically triggered when an agreed temperature threshold or other measurable condition is reached.

●Such instruments can provide faster financial support without waiting for lengthy post-disaster damage assessments.

●Parametric mechanisms should complement, rather than replace, public disaster-financing systems and social-protection measures.

Key Priorities for the Road Ahead:

Universal and Risk-Based Heat Planning:

●Every high-risk district and urban local body should develop a risk-informed Heat Action Plan based on local climate, demographic and infrastructure conditions.

●HAPs should be linked directly with State budgets, SDMF projects and municipal development plans.

Build Local Technical Capacity:

●States should establish dedicated technical teams capable of preparing costed, scientifically appraised and fundable mitigation projects.

●Universities, research institutions, civil-society organisations and specialised agencies can support local governments through technical assistance and capacity building.

Integrate Heat Resilience into Development:

●Heat resilience should become part of building codes, urban design, transport planning, labour regulations, housing policy and public-health systems.

●Nature-based solutions such as urban forests, wetlands, water bodies and shaded public spaces can reduce heat exposure while generating wider environmental benefits.

Protect Vulnerable Communities:

●Heat action should prioritise informal workers, agricultural labourers, elderly persons, children, low-income households and people living in poorly ventilated housing.

●Labour regulations can incorporate heat-rest schedules, drinking-water access, shaded workspaces and flexible working hours during extreme heat.

Conclusion:

The recognition of heatwaves and lightning as nationally notified disasters represents an important evolution in India’s disaster-governance framework. It aligns disaster financing more closely with the country’s changing risk profile and enables States to combine immediate relief with long-term mitigation.

However, financial eligibility alone cannot create resilience. The effectiveness of the reform will depend on converting Heat Action Plans into well-designed, adequately financed and locally implemented projects, strengthening heat-health surveillance, improving technical capacity and integrating climate resilience into development planning.

India should therefore move from a reactive disaster-response model towards anticipatory, risk-informed and climate-resilient governance. The objective should be not merely to compensate communities after extreme heat causes losses, but to reduce exposure and vulnerability before the disaster occurs.

Value Addition for UPSC:

Key Data Points:

●Notified disasters: 14, following the addition of heatwaves and lightning.

●State disaster funds recommended by FC-XVI: Approximately ₹2.04 lakh crore for 2026–27 to 2030–31.

●SDRF: Approximately ₹1.64 lakh crore under the detailed FC-XVI recommendation.

●SDMF: Approximately ₹0.41 lakh crore under the detailed FC-XVI recommendation.

●National disaster funds: ₹79,406 crore recommended for the same period.

Heat-risk exposure: 57% of Indian districts, representing approximately 76% of the population, face high to very high heat risk.