4B Movement

4b Movement

View January 2026 Crrent Affairs

In News: The 4B movement, a radical feminist current originating in South Korea, has resurfaced in public discourse amid renewed debates on patriarchy, gender-based violence, declining fertility, and women’s autonomy across societies.

What is the 4B Movement?

The 4B movement is a feminist resistance framework in which women collectively reject four institutions seen as pillars of patriarchal control:

  • No Marriage
  • No Childbirth
  • No Dating
  • No Sex (with men)

It is not merely a personal lifestyle choice but a deliberate political stance against traditional heterosexual norms and gendered expectations imposed on women.

Origin and Background

  • Country: South Korea
  • Period: Late 2010s
  • Emerged in response to:
  • Deep-rooted gender inequality
  • Online misogyny and harassment
  • High-profile cases of sexual violence
  • Institutional indifference to women’s safety and rights
  • Gained traction during the #MeToo movement in South Korea through online feminist platforms.

Key Features of the Movement

1. Radical Non-Engagement

  • Rejects negotiation or reform within patriarchal institutions.
  • Views marriage, reproduction, and heterosexual relationships as structurally unequal.

2. Rejection of Gendered Labour

  • Opposes expectations of:
  • Unpaid care work
  • Emotional labour
  • Sacrificial motherhood
  • Challenges the idea that women must sustain family and demographic systems.

3. Bodily Autonomy

  • Central emphasis on:
  • Consent
  • Sexual self-determination
  • Control over reproductive choices

4. Collective Resistance

  • Frames abstention as collective political action, not individual withdrawal.
  • Counters the narrative that women must “adjust” or “cope” within oppressive systems.

Significance

Social Significance

  • Questions the assumption that marriage and motherhood define womanhood.
  • Exposes how structural misogyny, not isolated incidents, shapes women’s lived realities.

Political Significance

  • Reframes refusal and withdrawal as legitimate forms of political agency.
  • Forces states to confront links between:
  • Gender injustice
  • Declining fertility rates
  • Social alienation

Global Relevance

  • Sparks debates worldwide on:
  • Feminism and demographic transitions
  • Gender justice and social norms
  • Autonomy vs societal expectations
  • Resonates in societies facing:
  • Rising gender violence
  • Declining marriage and birth rates
  • Women’s disenchantment with traditional institutions

Criticism and Debates

  • Critics argue it may:
  • Reinforce social polarisation
  • Limit dialogue between genders
  • Supporters contend:
  • It is a symptom, not the cause, of systemic gender injustice
  • True reform requires structural change, not moral appeals to women
Call Us Now
98403 94477